Strange screen displays and and avionics rules of the 789GE configuration and RR configuration
Although I am aware that the current 787-9 model still has some issues, these problems seem to be related to the original aircraft's avionics system. I must bring this up.
1：As shown in the picture, this is the central control screen of the current version of BA789GE configuration. The N1 display in it is obviously incorrect. This should not be the N1 display of the GE engine. It should be the N1 display of the RR engine (here I attach the actual central control display of the aircraft. The second one is from Tahiti Nui Airlines' 787-9 (GE engine), and the third one is from Latam Airlines' 787-9 (RR engine)
2:The fourth picture shows the instrument display when the BA787-9 landed. It can be observed that the radio altitude is already below 20 feet, but the FMA (Flight Management) signal panel does not display the word "idle" (According to the 787-9 FCOM, AT will automatically retract to the idle position when the altitude is between 50 and 25 feet. At this time, the FMA signal panel displays the word "idle". According to the actual aircraft, AT will automatically retract to the idle position when the altitude is 30 feet, and at this time the FMA signal panel displays the word "idle").
So is this a new bug caused by the update of the aircraft's internal avionics system? To be honest, it does have an impact on normal flight. I hope it will be fixed as soon as possible. Thank you!
- KKUN你太美 @KUNKUN
To be honest, I am extremely satisfied with the external design of this module. I hope the internal system can also be made perfect.:)
In reply toKUNKUN⬆:Max @TechnicalAssistantHello KunKun,
On which livery did you see the wrong engine type?
- KKUN你太美 @KUNKUN
This issue has nothing to do with livery. The fundamental reason is that when you upgraded the aircraft's internal avionics system, you failed to properly implement the GE configuration for the instrument displays, and made incorrect settings for certain avionics rules. Because I have also tested the GE and RR configurations of the 787-8 module, both were normal.
PS:I also tested the avionics system of the 787-9RR configuration, and it also had the same problems as the 787-9GE configuration.- KKUN你太美 @KUNKUN
However, the N1 indication for the 787-9RR configuration is completely normal.
In reply toKUNKUN⬆:Francis @LeadDeveloper2026-03-06 22:44:53.844ZI'm looking at your images but I don't find any issue.
Air Tahiti Nui 787 uses GE engines.
The only error I find is that we have that [N3] indicator.Latam is Rolls Royce.
- KKUN你太美 @KUNKUN
Please take a close look. The first picture shows the Bravoairspace 787-9 GE configuration, and the second one is the Horizon Simulations 787-9 GE configuration. Haven't you noticed the difference apart from the presence or absence of the N3 display? The N1 display of the BA 787-9 GE is incorrect. Please refer to the N1 display of the Horizon 787-9 GE for correction.
Max @TechnicalAssistant@KUNKUN ,
We understand your passion, but we do not use another developer's work as a reference in real-world scenarios. We do not use another sim developer, whether it is XP or Flight Sim, for references. It's all strictly real world or nothing at all. Yet, having said that, good for them for getting it right.
As @LeadDeveloper mentioned above, he found the difference. Read his post.
And he revised it last night.- KKUN你太美 @KUNKUN
I'm very sorry for pointing out the problem in such a hasty manner. It's because I couldn't find any clearer pictures of the real aircraft anymore, so I only can chose to use the models from other manufacturers to illustrate the issue. However, it's good that there's finally some progress. Thank you very much for your active cooperation.
- In reply toKUNKUN⬆:Max @TechnicalAssistant
This was a quick fix he did last night.
He just needs to stretch those indicators higher.